The litigation described in the following represents a material legal risk from today’s perspective, although the existence of other potential material legal risks cannot be ruled out.

Civil Class Action Lawsuits over Diisocyanates (in the United States)

On July⁠ ⁠9,⁠ ⁠2018, Covestro LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (United States) – as one of numerous other defendants – was served the first of now 12 class action lawsuits initiated by various U.S. diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) and toluene diisocyanate (TDI) customers. The plaintiffs allege that the defendants have violated various provisions of the Sherman Antitrust Act since January⁠ ⁠1,⁠ ⁠2015, by acting in coordination to limit production capacities of MDI and TDI and, at the same time, raising prices for these products in the market. On October⁠ ⁠3,⁠ ⁠2018, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ruled that all class action lawsuits in pretrial proceedings would be centralized in the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Based in essence on the same assertions and the violations of federal consumer protection and antitrust laws allegedly resulting from them, the attorney general of the state of Mississippi filed a separate civil complaint against Covestro LLC and numerous other defendants on behalf of the state and its citizens in September⁠ ⁠2019. In November⁠ ⁠2020, the parties suspended these lawsuits without prejudice for a period of two years. Owing to the time which has passed, the suspension of the limitation period agreed at the time with regard to the claims of the state and its citizens expired again in November⁠ ⁠2022. Covestro currently considers these claims without merit and will therefore use all legal means to defend itself against these allegations – also in light of the official conclusion in November⁠ ⁠2018 of the six-month investigation by the U.S. Department of Justice into possible anticompetitive practices in relation to MDI. The case is still in the discovery phase.